Manchester City found guilty of 'sham' contracts and misleading accounts in Premier League APT case
A long-running legal case between Manchester City and the Premier League over the APT (Associated Party Transaction) rules has reached a new phase, with an independent panel ruling that City engaged in 'sham' contracts and submitted misleading financial accounts. The dispute centers on the Premier League's regulations governing commercial deals between clubs and entities linked to their owners, which City argue are anti-competitive and unfair. The panel's findings could have significant ramifications for the league's financial fair play framework and for City's position within the Premier League. The case has been ongoing for several years and the ruling is likely to be appealed.
Read the full story at bbc.co.ukThis ruling deepens the legal standoff between Manchester City and the Premier League over the APT rules, which govern how clubs value commercial deals with entities tied to their ownership. A finding that City used 'sham' contracts and misleading accounts is a serious reputational blow and raises the stakes in a case that could reshape the Premier League's financial regulatory architecture. Depending on the outcome of any appeal, the fallout could influence how sponsorship rules and fair play mechanisms are enforced across the league.
Context added by Socc360, not by bbc.co.uk.
Data source: bbc.co.uk (via Socc360). Last updated .
More epl stories
Never miss a moment.
Live scores, goal alerts and Live Activities on your Lock Screen — get Socc360 for iOS.