Why was Elliot Anderson's handball not given as a penalty? Officiating Q&A
The Athletic's regular officiating Q&A tackles the handball decision involving Elliot Anderson during a match involving Manchester City. Despite what the column describes as 'irrefutable' evidence pointing to a handball offense, the on-field decision and VAR review did not result in a penalty. The article breaks down the Laws of the Game application, likely discussing the interpretation around deliberate handball, arm position, and the threshold for VAR intervention. Such Q&As are part of a broader Premier League conversation about consistency in officiating standards and how subjective elements of handball law continue to produce controversial outcomes.
Read the full story at nytimes.comHandball decisions remain one of the most contested areas of Premier League officiating, and this episode puts a fresh spotlight on the gap between what the laws technically permit referees to punish and what VAR is willing to overturn. When a leading officiating voice publicly describes the evidence as 'irrefutable,' it highlights how the subjective 'deliberate' threshold and arm-position guidance can override clear visual evidence, fueling frustration among clubs, players and fans who feel the application lacks consistency. For supporters, this kind of column matters because it pulls back the curtain on the decision-making process and frames the narrative around whether the PGMOL and its reviewers are applying the same standards week to week.
Context added by Socc360, not by nytimes.com.
Data source: nytimes.com (via Socc360). Last updated .
More premier league stories
Never miss a moment.
Live scores, goal alerts and Live Activities on your Lock Screen — get Socc360 for iOS.